16/1/01
BS
and the PM
But
Seriously interviews the prime
minister, but seriously.
Mr. Prime Minister,
thank you for this exclusive
interview. To begin with,
why have you chosen davka
this column to speak to?
The reason is, I have
a lot to account for, and
that takes time, and my time
as prime minister is very
limited, so I can't just sit
around with journalists answering
for myself. So if I have little
chance to explain, I have
to tell the truth once and
for all, and this is the once,
and it has to be for all.
This is what my media
advisers decided. You see,
we figured out that the country
is split half and half, and
half of a half is voting for
me, which includes half the
people who voted for me last
time. That includes the Jews
and Arabs, Ethiopians and
Russians, religious and secular,
male and female, even the
decideds and undecideds, everybody
-- except, we discovered,
the anglo-saxim, which is
split 50.00001 to 49.99999.
We isolated the difference
to two immigrants from Florida,
a guy named Roger and his
wife Alice, and they have
nothing in common but one
thing: they both read this
column. Why, I don't know.
These two people are
the swing voters. And not
for the first time. We learned
a lesson from the American
elections.
How so?
I'm taking them out
to dinner tomorrow.
Wow! Does Arik know
about this?
He's having them over
for bourekas tonight.
Mr. Prime Minister,
there is unanimous consensus
that you are the worst Israeli
leader ever; in fact, many
people wonder if perhaps you
are the best Palestinian leader
ever. You're so unpopular,
even Peres could win an election
against you. You have been
a stunning disaster. Is this
fair?
What can you expect
from an Israeli leader? Only
that he should do his best.
I have done my best, and you
see the results. But next
time, I will do much better.
Next time?! You don't
have a snowball's hope in
hell of winning the elections.
Where do you get your delusionary
optimism?
My mother's side. When
the kids on the street used
to taunt me and say I look
like a turtle, my mother would
shout at them, "Someday
little Ehud will be prime
minister and then you'll all
be sorry." She knew,
even back then.
In the 18 months you
led this country down the
toilet, would you say you
made any blunders?
I thought I was wrong
once, but I was mistaken.
My only regret is, I should
have proclaimed the Temple
Mount sovereign Palestinian
territory when Arik was on
it. The foolish man wasn't
even carrying his passport.
You promised, swore,
vowed, guaranteed and pledged
that Jerusalem will never
be divided, which is why people
voted for you. Nu?
I repeat, Jerusalem
will not be divided. Subtracted,
yes. But let's be fair: they
were here first. Jesus was
Palestinian, and Adam and
Eve -- you wrote that yourself,
in this very column.
It's a humor column,
sir. It was a joke.
Oh.
If reelected, will
you keep your promises this
time?
I will not make promises
I can't keep, I promise. This
is a good example of how the
media twists the facts. I
said a lot of things that
the people of Israel needed
to hear to give me their votes.
That's not "making promises,"
it's "politics."
What, was everyone born yesterday?
Throughout this recent
intifada, you not only promised,
swore, vowed, guaranteed and
pledged assurances to Israelis
every time you opened your
mouth -- and then never followed
through -- but you also warned,
cautioned and threatened the
Palestinians just as often,
and then never followed through.
I remind you of the infamous
schoolyard-mentality "48-hour
warning or else" that
had Hizbullah quaking -- not
in fear, but in laughter.
More proof that the
media is out to get me. Sure,
they made a big thing out
of that, but when Arik visited
the Temple Mount, I warned
him to leave within 48 hours
or else, and he did, but no
one reported that.
You can be sure, mark
my words, next time I give
a "48-hour warning or
else," it will be exactly
48 hours and then zbeng!,
the settlers who don't leave
will be in a foreign country.
Where would the settlers
go?
They can go settle
the Negev.
By granting the Palestinian
refugees the right of return,
a million Israelis will be
kicked out of their homes,
thus creating a Jewish refugee
problem. The country will
be half the size with twice
the people.
No, no, no, you don't
understand. The right of return
is fair and equal. The Palestinians
will be allowed to return
to Israel, and the Israelis
will have the right to return
to Iran, Iraq, Russia, Poland.
I think I can get the Palestinians
to agree to this.
Back to the intifada:
You have been accused of everything
from indecision to cowardice.
Cowardice? Says who?!
Remember, when you
went to Gilo to show solidarity,
you stayed on the safe side
of the neighborhood. You posed
for a few pictures then got
the hell out; you didn't go
to the other side because,
you explained, your security
people felt it was "dangerous"
there.
If Gilo ever comes
under fire again, I vow, we
will not sit idly by for even
one second. We will shoot
at Gilo too, with a hundred
times the firepower, so that
no one can question the readiness
of the IDF to respond, and
respond fiercely. And this
time, you have my word, the
United Nations will not condemn
us.
You mean, attack Jews?!
CNN has promised sympathetic
coverage. You cannot underestimate
the importance of this.
Do you have any other
surprises in store?
Nope. There is nothing
more Arafat could ask for.
There was a time when
Israelis thought the ultimate
sacrifice for peace was giving
up Sinai. That was traumatic
enough, yet now you're practically
apologizing for wanting to
keep the Western Wall.
I guarantee that we
will never, ever give the
Wall to the Palestinians as
long as they don't ask for
it.
I don't even want to
ask about your promised secular
revolution.
I'm glad you brought
that up. You have my word
on this, every haredi will
be a fighting soldier. I have
a brilliant solution: They
don't want to fight in a Jewish
army, but they have no reservations
about fighting against Jews.
So we will give Mea Shearim
to the Palestinians, even
if they don't ask for it.
That's a solution?!
Sure. That way, all
the guns we gave the Palestinians
will end up in Jewish hands.
It seems that the nature
of the peace process has changed
under your tenure -- that
you are in reality negotiating
terms of surrender. The Palestinians
certainly think so: they're
now calling you a war criminal,
and saying you and the entire
government should stand trial.
After all I've done
for them.
Experts say you may have set
a historical precedent, that
this is the first time a country
declined to defend itself
against an inferior attacking
enemy.
Not true. Israel has
done it before. And that is
the basis for my strategy:
we responded to the stone-throwers
exactly the same way we responded
to Saddam's Scuds, by showing
we are fearless inside our
sealed rooms.
You control the
most vaunted army in the world,
yet a ragged rabble of rock-throwers
could lay siege to vital bridges
and roads and towns for months;
why didn't you use the IDF
to defend the country? After
all, it is the Israel
Defense Forces.
Never thought of it.
I'm a general. I'm trained
in the use of military might
for offensive options: to
wage full-scale warfare, or
retaliate, or attack.
I see. Well, thank
you Mr. Barak.
Thank you Mr. Orbach.
Orbaum.
Or bomb? Yes, that
was another option. Next time,
I promise...